data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/714f3/714f3c43d397e44f09dcdf6d76b9456837a9d699" alt="kentucky derby artwork 2009"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14651/14651b485fea8dfe32946defce5edb15200f3aa0" alt="kentucky derby artwork 2008"
I don't see much differentiation between the two pieces. Appearing as if painted by the same artist with similar palettes, there's so much...beige. Same art deco style, same fashion emphasis, same ladies hats representing the roses of the Derby and lilies of the Oaks, same wealthy-for-a day fantasy. The celebrated horse race plays a distant, insignificant role. If you peruse the individual artist's websites, you'll find lovely, whimsical, strong artwork. So, why is the Derby artwork so bland? And so alike?
Most annoying is the bored, disinterested depiction of the "fashionistas". Stereotypically turning their backs on the most exciting two minutes in sports.
OMG, is it over yet?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5426/f54263f60000232696a234ae73243b4928c27e0c" alt="kentucky oaks artwork 2009"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c141c/c141c147479cea799b8ce53b64661e1b9da7457a" alt="kentucky oaks artwork 2008"
“Money, horse racing and women, three things the boys just can't figure out.” - Will Rogers